diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/test_xpath.cpp | 46 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_xpath.cpp b/tests/test_xpath.cpp index 1a9a159..4296d48 100644 --- a/tests/test_xpath.cpp +++ b/tests/test_xpath.cpp @@ -460,4 +460,50 @@ TEST_XML(xpath_sort_copy_share, "<node><child1 attr1='value1' attr2='value2'/><c xpath_node_set_tester(sorted, "sorted order failed") % 2 % 3 % 4 % 5 % 6 % 7 % 8; xpath_node_set_tester(reverse_sorted, "reverse sorted order failed") % 8 % 7 % 6 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 2; } + +TEST_XML(xpath_sort_move_share, "<node><child1 attr1='value1' attr2='value2'/><child2 attr1='value1'>test</child2></node>") +{ + // moving changes the relation between name/value data and document order, this can potentially make document order optimization invalid (silently) + xml_node node = doc.child(STR("node")); + xml_node child1 = node.child(STR("child1")); + xml_node child2 = node.child(STR("child2")); + + // swap child1 & child2 + node.prepend_move(child2); + node.append_move(child1); + + // just some random union order, it should not matter probably? + xpath_node_set ns = doc.child(STR("node")).select_nodes(STR("child1 | child2 | child1/@* | . | child2/@* | child2/text()")); + + ns.sort(false); + xpath_node_set sorted = ns; + + ns.sort(true); + xpath_node_set reverse_sorted = ns; + + xpath_node_set_tester(sorted, "sorted order failed") % 2 % 3 % 4 % 5 % 6 % 7 % 8; + xpath_node_set_tester(reverse_sorted, "reverse sorted order failed") % 8 % 7 % 6 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 2; +} + +TEST_XML(xpath_sort_append_buffer, "<node /><node />") +{ + // append_buffer changes the relation between name/value data and document order, this can potentially make document order optimization invalid (silently) + const char* child1 = "<child1 attr1='value1' attr2='value2'/>"; + const char* child2 = "<child2 attr1='value1'>test </child2>"; + + doc.last_child().append_buffer(child2, strlen(child2)); + doc.first_child().append_buffer(child1, strlen(child1)); + + // just some random union order, it should not matter probably? + xpath_node_set ns = doc.select_nodes(STR("node/child1 | node/child2 | node/child1/@* | node/. | node/child2/@* | node/child2/text()")); + + ns.sort(false); + xpath_node_set sorted = ns; + + ns.sort(true); + xpath_node_set reverse_sorted = ns; + + xpath_node_set_tester(sorted, "sorted order failed") % 2 % 3 % 4 % 5 % 6 % 7 % 8 % 9; + xpath_node_set_tester(reverse_sorted, "reverse sorted order failed") % 9 % 8 % 7 % 6 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 2; +} #endif |